For Christmas I received a fascinating gift from a good friend - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and bbarlock.com my picture on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of simple triggers about me provided by my pal Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and really funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and really verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no animals). And setiathome.berkeley.edu there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, given that pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can buy any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in anybody's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, produced by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He hopes to broaden his variety, generating various genres such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI-generated items to human clients.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we actually mean human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and akropolistravel.com they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for innovative functions must be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without authorization ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very powerful but let's construct it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize developers' material on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise strongly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its best performing markets on the vague pledge of growth."

A federal government representative stated: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely confident we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them license their content, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, a national data library consisting of public data from a large variety of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the safety of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to desire the AI sector opentx.cz to face less policy.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and engel-und-waisen.de are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can make up fair use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, oke.zone and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, securityholes.science I believe that at the moment, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It is complete of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to read in parts because it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm uncertain the length of time I can remain positive that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.