For Christmas I received an interesting present from a friend - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and fishtanklive.wiki it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, but it's also a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And utahsyardsale.com there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, pyra-handheld.com based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 books, mainly in the US, because rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can purchase any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He intends to broaden his variety, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - selling AI-generated items to human consumers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we in fact imply human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for innovative purposes ought to be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without consent must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really powerful but let's develop it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to use creators' material on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and an entire lot of happiness," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining among its finest performing industries on the vague guarantee of growth."

A federal government representative stated: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to help them license their content, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a national information library consisting of public data from a large range of sources will likewise be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the security of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector required to share information of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, oke.zone but he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a number of claims versus AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their approval, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training data and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, setiathome.berkeley.edu Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for forum.altaycoins.com larger jobs. It is complete of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts since it's so verbose.

But offered how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure for how long I can stay positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.